Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	21.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4300-$73 55,454 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	Memory 81 1-Core 67.3 2-Core 124 56% 90.7 Pts	4-Core 196 8-Core 192 26% 194 Pts	64-Core 191 12% 191 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B 49,289 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Sapphire(1DA2 E348) 2GB CLim: 1226 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.3.1 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	21.2% Poor	Lighting 26.2 Reflection 28.6 Parallax 37.4 21% 30.7 fps	MRender 26.8 Gravity 29.1 Splatting 22.1 21% 26 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 22%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: 608ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 106 100 94 90 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	51.1% Above average	Read 176 Write 139 Mixed 161 SusWrite 99.3 32% 144 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 57.4 4K Mixed 33.5 114% 39.4 MB/s	DQ Read 31.6 DQ Write 74.5 DQ Mixed 37.7 33% 47.9 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.C8F Kingston 99U5474-013.A00LF 6GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	33.1% Below average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 8.1 MC Mixed 11.4 32% 11.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 9 24% 8.27 GB/s	Latency 78.7 51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	55x
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	33x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	16x

RAM
2x4GBAdataBench 60%, 13,050 samples	12x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	9x
99U5471-054.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 30%, 12,132 samples	9x

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $177