Today's hottest deals

Apple MacPro7,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive276% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple MacPro7,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-27AD2F918AE68F61
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '21 at 21:17
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-3265M
CPU0, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.3% Very good
Memory 71.9
1-Core 114
2-Core 228
76% 138 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 823
73% 617 Pts
64-Core 3,297
204% 3,297 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 580X
Apple(106B 0206) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 1710 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.45.40.10
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
14.8% Very poor
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 6.3
Parallax 2.5
3% 4.03 fps
MRender 53.5
Gravity 54.3
Splatting 37
38% 48.3 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1043 987 840 756 706 655 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
276% Outstanding
Read 2,567
Write 2391
Mixed 1,897
SusWrite 831
430% 1,922 MB/s
4K Read 62.9
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 86.8
289% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 853
DQ Write 624
DQ Mixed 737
551% 738 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 276%
Great: 410%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 9ASF1G72PZ-2G9E6 4x8GB
4 of 12 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 42.1
MC Write 51.1
MC Mixed 36.3
123% 43.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 10.1
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 97.1
41% 97.1 ns
Poor: 93%
This bench: 106%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacPro7,1 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat

System: Apple MacPro7,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $95
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback