Today's hottest deals

HP hAXOR.sUXOR.sOXOR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics33.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP hAXOR.sUXOR.sOXOR  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A90h
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100303
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateDec 17 '21 at 14:28
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
63.8% Good
Memory 87
1-Core 80.2
2-Core 154
65% 107 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 282
33% 255 Pts
64-Core 285
18% 285 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 280
Gigabyte(1458 229A) 3GB
CLim: 1072 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.11.2
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
33.8% Below average
Lighting 45
Reflection 38.4
Parallax 60.1
37% 47.8 fps
MRender 33.5
Gravity 45.4
Splatting 26.9
28% 35.3 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 187 162 160 150 147 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.3% Above average
Read 234
Write 231
Mixed 222
SusWrite 165
48% 213 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 26.9
99% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 87.7
DQ Mixed 124
97% 137 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
26GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 198 193 195 205 209 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63.6% Good
Read 236
Write 231
Mixed 217
SusWrite 197
50% 220 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 61
4K Mixed 31.1
108% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 195
147% 196 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 134%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 500GB
19GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 97 94 97 97 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 102
Write 26.6
Mixed 41.9
SusWrite 96.4
49% 66.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.3
221% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 174%
WD My Passport 0837 1TB
818GB free, PID 0837
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 30 30 31 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 31.4
Write 28.8
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 30
39% 29 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17%
Great: 44%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
23GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 5.7 5.1 6 4.9 4.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
5.82% Terrible
Read 23.6
Write 5.2
Mixed 12
SusWrite 6
13% 11.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.82%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9801AD80 KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9801AD80 9905403-198.A00LF 9801AD80 9905403-198.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
37.5% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 12
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 11.3
26% 9.13 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical hAXOR.sUXOR.sOXOR Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: HP hAXOR.sUXOR.sOXOR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $185
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback