HP EliteDesk 800 G5 TWR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics84% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G5 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8591
Memory58.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210728
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 17 '21 at 17:45
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$395
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Memory 89.8
1-Core 142
2-Core 260
92% 164 Pts
4-Core 540
8-Core 1,067
95% 803 Pts
64-Core 1,411
87% 1,411 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$265
HP(103C 6903) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
84% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 87.4
Parallax 86.4
90% 94.7 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 93.9
Splatting 71.6
73% 91.6 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 84%
Great: 97%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN730 SDB 1TB
789GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1322 1015 1027 1132 989 942 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 1893
Write 2,008
Mixed 1,833
SusWrite 1,071
383% 1,701 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 76.3
4K Mixed 52
173% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 430
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 447
309% 386 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 211%
Great: 296%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CTD Hynix HMA82GU6JJR8N-VK M378A2K43CB1-CTD Hynix HMA82GU6JJR8N-VK 64GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
77.5% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 24.2
78% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 32.7
SC Mixed 25.8
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G5 TWR Builds (Compare 227 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G5 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $510
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback