Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515DA_M515DA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive127% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515DA_M515DA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X515DA
Memory4.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210113
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateDec 18 '21 at 09:31
Run Duration257 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Memory 35.4
1-Core 74.8
2-Core 142
45% 84 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 381
32% 273 Pts
64-Core 55.9
4% 55.9 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 1FBF) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.44.05
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.17% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 3.7
2% 3.07 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 2.17%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GB
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21106000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 284 176 183 178 180 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 1,213
Write 925
Mixed 915
SusWrite 219
182% 818 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 68.6
4K Mixed 43.1
145% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 569
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 442
329% 443 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 127%
Great: 189%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 12GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
26.7% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 12.5
27% 9.57 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 12.1
23% 8.03 GB/s
Latency 225
18% 225 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515DA_M515DA Builds (Compare 170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515DA_M515DA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback