Lenovo 80E5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive20% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 80E5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo G50-80
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160108
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateDec 18 '21 at 15:24
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Memory 77.8
1-Core 79.6
2-Core 135
59% 97.5 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 193
26% 194 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Legend(17AA 390B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.04% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 6
4% 4.33 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 6.6
5% 5.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.04%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 14 67 13 40 41 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20% Poor
Read 187
Write 87.4
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 42.3
21% 96.6 MB/s
4K Read 8.3
4K Write 15.9
4K Mixed 7.4
30% 10.5 MB/s
DQ Read 15.9
DQ Write 16.7
DQ Mixed 15
12% 15.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 20%
Great: 85%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
254GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 58 59 60 60 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 59.1
Write 42.7
Mixed 39.8
SusWrite 59.5
37% 50.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
108% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 59%
Generic External 320GB
298GB free
Firmware: 0109
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 87 91 93 89 93 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 75.3
Write 63.8
Mixed 34
SusWrite 90.9
48% 66 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
48% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 15.8
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 15
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 48%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80E5 Builds (Compare 1,460 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80E5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback