Today's hottest deals

Asus H97-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H97-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 20 '21 at 22:43
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$104
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 94.6
1-Core 111
2-Core 216
81% 140 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 581
61% 491 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Gigabyte(1458 3515) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 33.3
Parallax 17.2
16% 23.5 fps
MRender 28.9
Gravity 22.6
Splatting 20
19% 23.8 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 240GB-$73
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 128 108 106 83 103 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.6% Average
Read 225
Write 201
Mixed 162
SusWrite 116
39% 176 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 38.3
4K Mixed 20.3
69% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 40.9
DQ Mixed 56.3
46% 65.9 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 91%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
625GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 13 12 10 7.7 9.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 26% Great: 51%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
558GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 4.9 5.1 4.1 5.8 5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Performance DDR3 1600 C9 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
55% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 16.4
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 17.7
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 58.2
69% 58.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,010 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H97-PLUS - $414

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $818
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback