Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X545FA_X545FA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive93.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 80% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X545FA_X545FA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X545FA
Memory6.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211102
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateDec 22 '21 at 07:06
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 66%
CPU Throttled 80%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10110U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Memory 37.6
1-Core 77
2-Core 119
44% 77.9 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 165
20% 153 Pts
64-Core 160
10% 160 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 1AD1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1191
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.1% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 6.8
4% 5.33 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 9.6
6% 7.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.1%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1102 256GB
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20180000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 129 102 101 134 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Read 1,078
Write 833
Mixed 832
SusWrite 137
160% 720 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 32
4K Mixed 30.2
102% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 320
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 245
178% 236 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 169%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
612GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 3.8 3.9 5.9 9.6 8.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 26% Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Crucial CT8G4SFRA266.C8FE 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.6% Good
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 21.7
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 15.4
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 214
19% 214 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X545FA_X545FA Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X545FA_X545FA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $50
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback