| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 48.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-E/M.2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190528 |
| Uptime | 3.4 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 22 '21 at 17:07 |
| Run Duration | 148 Seconds |
| Run User | VNM-User |
| Background CPU | 71% |
PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
70.9%
Very good
|
70% 130 Pts
|
62% 462 Pts
|
18% 283 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.7%
Poor
|
30% 38.2 fps
|
27% 34.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Team T253LE120G 120GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 122 82 62 53 43 MB/s
|
48.6%
Average
|
50% 223 MB/s
|
65% 25 MB/s
|
148% 217 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
350GB free
Firmware: HPH3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 169 180 181 179 180 MB/s
|
99.6%
Outstanding
|
109% 149 MB/s
|
129% 0.87 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown VMA42UG-MIC1U22T2 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
60.7%
Good
|
66% 23 GB/s
|
40% 13.8 GB/s
|
31% 128 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-E/M.2 Builds (Compare 1,422 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-E/M.2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $89Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 215x |
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 189x |
| Core i3-7100Intel $62Bench 57%, 79,299 samples | 168x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 176x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 171x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 109x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $176 |