Panasonic CF-54-2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.24% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemPanasonic CF-54-2  (all builds)
MotherboardPanasonic CF54-2
Memory12.3 GB free of 16.0156 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210825
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 22 '21 at 21:31
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 45%
CPU Throttled 96%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Memory 76
1-Core 83.7
2-Core 150
61% 103 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 153
27% 188 Pts
64-Core 167
10% 167 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Device(10F7 8338) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7209
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
5.24% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 6.8
5% 5.67 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 9.6
6% 7.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.24%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
399GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GH2OA3E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 105 101 98 98 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 120
Write 122
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 103
69% 95.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 Kingston 9905428-417.A00LF 64GB
1600, 1600, 0 MHz
8192, 8192, 49152 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
58.6% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 19.8
60% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 18.1
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CF-54-2 Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Panasonic CF-54-2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback