Panasonic CF-54-2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemPanasonic CF-54-2  (all builds)
MotherboardPanasonic CF54-2
Memory13.3 GB free of 16.0156 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170511
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 28 '20 at 00:09
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%
CPU Throttled 96%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
47% Average
Memory 63.7
1-Core 54.8
2-Core 112
46% 76.8 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 195
24% 184 Pts
64-Core 159
10% 159 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 47%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Device(10F7 8338) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4550
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
4.04% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 4.8
4% 4.43 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 4.1
Splatting 7.6
5% 5.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.04%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 354 358 344 323 311 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 275
Write 260
Mixed 221
SusWrite 335
62% 273 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 43.7
4K Mixed 32.1
93% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 269
223% 321 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 Kingston 9905428-417.A00LF 64GB
1600, 1600, 0 MHz
8192, 8192, 49152 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.8% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 19.1
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 17.3
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CF-54-2 Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Panasonic CF-54-2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback