Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 16-a0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics63% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 16-a0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87AF
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210317
Uptime5.4 Days
Run DateDec 24 '21 at 19:36
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
85% Excellent
Memory 93.7
1-Core 128
2-Core 236
87% 152 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 654
66% 533 Pts
64-Core 656
41% 656 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 85%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile Max-Q)
HP(103C 87AF) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7219
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
63% Good
Lighting 77.8
Reflection 86.7
Parallax 73.1
63% 79.2 fps
MRender 92.2
Gravity 72.2
Splatting 67.8
62% 77.4 fps
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63%
Great: 64%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Optane+477G 512GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 17.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 108 56 55 73 58 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 94%
General UDisk 2TB
2TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 4.1 0 1.2 2.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
1.34% Terrible
Read 6.5
Write 5
Mixed 1.5
SusWrite 1.7
4% 3.67 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
4% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.34%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-XN 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.2% Good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 18.7
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 22.8
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 60.6
66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Laptop 16-a0xxx Builds (Compare 2,404 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 16-a0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback