Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H97M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H97M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160303
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 24 '21 at 19:56
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 81.9
1-Core 89.4
2-Core 178
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 361
47% 354 Pts
64-Core 354
22% 354 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
CLim: 1545 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.11.3
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.5% Above average
Lighting 69.9
Reflection 68.9
Parallax 96.8
57% 78.5 fps
MRender 69
Gravity 75.7
Splatting 53.2
53% 66 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
412GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 405 358 305 305 304 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 466
Write 434
Mixed 424
SusWrite 342
94% 416 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 81.7
4K Mixed 46.7
158% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 356
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 105%
Great: 129%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 163 162 167 165 154 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 194
Mixed 91
SusWrite 162
116% 158 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 1.1
259% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 100%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 1315 CT102464BD160B.C16 1315 BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 1315 CT102464BD160B.C16 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
59.4% Above average
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 17.9
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 18.1
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H97M-D3H Builds (Compare 2,242 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H97M-D3H - $84

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $303
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback