Today's hottest deals

HP Laptop 15-db0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (98%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Laptop 15-db0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84AC
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190515
Uptime4.5 Days
Run DateDec 25 '21 at 10:58
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 98%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-9125 RADEON R3, 4 COMPUTE CORES 2C+2G
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Memory 67.5
1-Core 32.9
2-Core 60.8
37% 53.7 Pts
4-Core 59.2
8-Core 62
8% 60.6 Pts
64-Core 64.6
4% 64.6 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
HP(103C 84AC) 80MB
Ram: 80MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
2.19% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 4.3
Parallax 3.2
2% 3.23 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 5
3% 3.4 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.19%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$49
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 131 74 39 37 29 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 355
Write 275
Mixed 304
SusWrite 72.8
56% 252 MB/s
DQ Read 87.9
DQ Write 91
DQ Mixed 1.5
25% 60.1 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 44.9
79% 31.9 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 86%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
889GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 65 62 64 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 118
Write 97.5
Mixed 49.4
SusWrite 64.2
60% 82.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.1% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 5.4
16% 5.67 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 2.2
9% 3.13 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15-db0xxx Builds (Compare 1,060 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-db0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback