HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-0xxx

Performance Results


Gaming 60% Destroyer	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 45% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	88.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	97% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8653
Memory	0.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191126
Uptime	7.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 26 '21 at 12:54
Run Duration	293 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	28%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$96 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	68.4% Good	Memory 90.1 1-Core 115 2-Core 227 82% 144 Pts	4-Core 270 8-Core 282 37% 276 Pts	64-Core 283 18% 283 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$294 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% HP(103C 8557) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 497.09 Performing below potential (43^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	88.7% Excellent	Lighting 112 Reflection 90.3 Parallax 104 91% 102 fps	MRender 125 Gravity 105 Splatting 87 84% 106 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 88.7% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv256g KIOXIA 256GB 8,196 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: ADHA0102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 192 198 197 169 178 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	97% Outstanding	Read 725 Write 447 Mixed 280 SusWrite 195 91% 412 MB/s	4K Read 35.4 4K Write 70.5 4K Mixed 24.8 123% 43.6 MB/s	DQ Read 633 DQ Write 257 DQ Mixed 384 300% 425 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 97% Great: 152%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 102GB free Firmware: MS2OA8L0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 162 159 137 129 135 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	93.7% Outstanding	Read 182 Write 162 Mixed 20.2 SusWrite 144 92% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.5 116% 1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 93.7% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43DB2-CTD 1x8GB 7,517 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	33.4% Below average	MC Read 13.4 MC Write 9.9 MC Mixed 9.6 31% 11 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 7.3 SC Mixed 8.8 25% 8.77 GB/s	Latency 67.1 60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-0xxx Builds (Compare 3,062 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 49%

Yacht

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-0xxx

CPU
Ryzen 5 3500AMD $140Bench 81%, 16,466 samples	1,333x
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	461x
Core i5-9400Intel $161Bench 86%, 22,187 samples	331x

GPU
GTX 1650S (Super)Nvidia $300Bench 59%, 180,577 samples	1,058x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	820x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	221x

SSD
KIOXIA 256GBKxg60znv256gBench 169%, 5,284 samples	234x
hynix BC511 HFM256GDJTNI-82A0A 256GBSKBench 146%, 8,367 samples	220x
SSDPEKNW512G8H 512GBIntelBench 147%, 27,018 samples	189x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 43%, 19,029 samples	218x
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 80%, 29,586 samples	203x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	166x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $440

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16