Today's hottest deals

Biostar H61MH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics58.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar H61MH  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110218
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 30 '21 at 14:02
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User SLV-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 87.1
1-Core 91.9
2-Core 179
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 326
40% 306 Pts
64-Core 325
20% 325 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Lighting 72.6
Reflection 75.5
Parallax 68.7
59% 72.3 fps
MRender 66.9
Gravity 72.6
Splatting 68.5
57% 69.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480 GB 480GB
308GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG3600RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 94 78 84 123 22 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.1% Below average
Read 207
Write 178
Mixed 152
SusWrite 81.5
35% 155 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 18.8
4K Mixed 16.4
54% 16.8 MB/s
DQ Read 18.3
DQ Write 24.9
DQ Mixed 19.9
16% 21 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 57%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 320GB-$54
204GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 83 83 84 84 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 74.3
Write 78.1
Mixed 45.9
SusWrite 82.7
52% 70.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 59%
Seagate SkyHawk 1TB (2016)-$66
634GB free
Firmware: CV11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 151 151 150 151 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 151
Write 142
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 145
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905402-570.A00LF 9905402-570.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.8% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 12.3
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 12.5
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61MH Builds (Compare 102 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar H61MH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback