Asus G20AJ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus G20AJ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G20AJ
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140917
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 30 '21 at 15:20
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 94.5
2-Core 184
73% 123 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 354
45% 343 Pts
64-Core 355
22% 355 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Nvidia(10DE 1116) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.3% Above average
Lighting 69.3
Reflection 79.3
Parallax 72.9
56% 73.8 fps
MRender 75.8
Gravity 69.2
Splatting 62.9
56% 69.3 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SC100S37128GD 128GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM06.9
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 452
Write 326
Mixed 229
74% 336 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 70.4
4K Mixed 22.1
95% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 12.6
41% 90.7 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 79%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
287GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 138 138 139 138 138 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 171
Write 137
Mixed 30
SusWrite 137
86% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TIMETEC-SD3-1600 Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
60.4% Good
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 18.9
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 18.7
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G20AJ Builds (Compare 966 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G20AJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $252
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback