MSI MS-1799

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics23.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GL72M 7RDX
MotherboardMSI MS-1799  (all builds)
Memory15.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180323
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateJan 02 '22 at 04:45
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 93.5
2-Core 188
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 533
55% 441 Pts
64-Core 548
34% 548 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 11C9) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.9709
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Lighting 30.3
Reflection 30.2
Parallax 31.3
25% 30.6 fps
MRender 33.7
Gravity 31.9
Splatting 20
22% 28.5 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8180S3128GI1 128GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK60B9
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 435
Write 333
Mixed 309
80% 359 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 83.2
4K Mixed 27.1
128% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 178
160% 239 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 78%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
442GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 107 97 106 102 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 64.1
Write 86.9
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 102
55% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2400C16-8GRS 04CD F4-2400C16-16GRS 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.4% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 16.5
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 16.8
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-1799 Builds (Compare 1,523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-1799

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback