Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16P7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GE63 Raider RGB 8SF
MotherboardMSI MS-16P7  (all builds)
Memory7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190702
Uptime8.4 Days
Run DateJan 04 '22 at 02:48
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 70.3
1-Core 60.2
2-Core 162
55% 97.4 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 441
44% 360 Pts
64-Core 504
31% 504 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 126A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 6
Reflection 30
Parallax 7.7
5% 14.6 fps
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1
1% 0.95 fps
Poor: 4% Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G 512GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20140000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 248 195 170 182 174 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 891
Write 663
Mixed 786
SusWrite 242
144% 645 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 82.7
4K Mixed 30.5
139% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 737
DQ Write 534
DQ Mixed 628
472% 633 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 120%
Great: 212%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
210GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 78 89 87 87 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 63.7
Write 89.7
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 81.2
54% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.2
86% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI26D4S9D8ME-16 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
44.7% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 13.1
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 14
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16P7 Builds (Compare 1,665 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16P7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback