Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220 13,149 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Socket 989, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	58.9% Above average	Memory 90.5 1-Core 59.3 2-Core 110 56% 86.8 Pts	4-Core 154 8-Core 198 22% 176 Pts	64-Core 198 12% 198 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Mobility Radeon HD 5730 2,535 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 1C22) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	4.53% Terrible	Lighting 5.7 Reflection 6.7 Parallax 5 5% 5.8 fps	MRender 5.9 Gravity 4.3 Splatting 5.5 4% 5.23 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.53% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 205GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 206 209 210 211 211 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	49.1% Average	Read 219 Write 204 Mixed 206 SusWrite 208 47% 209 MB/s	4K Read 16 4K Write 31.1 4K Mixed 17.9 64% 21.7 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 181 DQ Mixed 178 134% 179 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 78.A2GC9.AF0 017A 78.A2GD8.4010C 4GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	36.6% Below average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 10.5 MC Mixed 10.8 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 10 SC Mixed 10.7 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 66.5 60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7 Q 720Intel $220Bench 51%, 13,149 samples	66x
Core i7 Q 740Intel $190Bench 54%, 13,278 samples	23x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 5730AMDBench 4%, 2,535 samples	89x

RAM
ASU1333D3S9DR8/2G 2x2GBKingstonBench 27%, 948 samples	12x
HMT125S6BFR8C-G7 2x2GBHynixBench 24%, 1,873 samples	9x
HMT125S6TFR8C-H9 2x2GBHynixBench 29%, 1,376 samples	7x

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $279