Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16J3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GP62 2QE
MotherboardMSI MS-16J3  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150923
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 11 '22 at 22:12
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 76.7
1-Core 112
2-Core 224
76% 138 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 552
63% 491 Pts
64-Core 531
33% 531 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 5600
MSI(1462 114C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
4.6% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 8
5% 5.5 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 5.6
5% 5.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.6%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAV256TBN-1AR15ABHA 256GB
211GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPC0T12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 383 284 69 100 141 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 407
Write 401
Mixed 359
SusWrite 228
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 78.2
4K Mixed 33.7
115% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 307
224% 288 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI16D3LS1MNG/8G Hynix HMT351S6CFR8A-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.1% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 8.8
28% 9.97 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 10.7
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16J3 Builds (Compare 186 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback