Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H61-MX R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive50.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-MX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120815
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '22 at 12:49
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$92
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.2% Good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 88.2
2-Core 171
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 228
30% 228 Pts
64-Core 227
14% 227 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 525 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Lighting 15.9
Reflection 10.7
Parallax 15.1
13% 13.9 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 17.6
Splatting 16.2
11% 13.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst Elite 120GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW200918
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 209 216 226 224 227 MB/s
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.4% Above average
Read 222
Write 3.5
Mixed 144
SusWrite 216
33% 146 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 52.6
4K Mixed 11
74% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 16
50% 108 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
71GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 104 102 104 101 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 101
Write 99.6
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 102
67% 90.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AE34G1339U2 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
30% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 8.7
26% 9.23 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-MX R2.0 Builds (Compare 763 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-MX R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback