Today's hottest deals

Asus G751JT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus G751JT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G751JT
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190611
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJan 15 '22 at 11:59
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 80.4
1-Core 98.1
2-Core 168
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 517
52% 424 Pts
64-Core 510
32% 510 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970M
Asus(1043 22DA) 3GB
CLim: 1038 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Lighting 40.7
Reflection 44.1
Parallax 39.1
33% 41.3 fps
MRender 41.4
Gravity 41
Splatting 35.4
32% 39.3 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X300s Non-Secure 256GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2150000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 225 214 199 188 167 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 462
Write 334
Mixed 245
SusWrite 211
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 49.9
4K Mixed 27.6
101% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 307
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 149
151% 244 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 98%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
279GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 100 99 100 100 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 96.6
Write 92.8
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 99.3
56% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMSO8GX3M1C1600C11 Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.1% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 8.3
28% 9.93 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 10.2
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G751JT Builds (Compare 650 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Asus G751JT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback