Packard EasyNote TS11HR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemPackard EasyNote TS11HR  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard SJV50_HR
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 17 '22 at 18:34
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2540M-$315
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
54.3% Above average
Memory 73.7
1-Core 84.2
2-Core 119
57% 92.4 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 200
27% 202 Pts
64-Core 203
13% 203 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Acer(1025 0511) 2GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.88% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 1.6
2% 1.8 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 2.7
2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.88%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$20
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 162 57 57 54 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 285
Write 195
Mixed 226
SusWrite 105
45% 203 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 45
4K Mixed 19.9
75% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 158
137% 199 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 87%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
464GB free
Firmware: GH2ZB550
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 132 132 133 133 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 124
Write 128
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 133
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT451S6BFR8A-PB HMT451S6DFR8A-PB 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 14.9
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 13.9
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 93.1
43% 93.1 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EasyNote TS11HR Builds (Compare 218 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote TS11HR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $185
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback