Acer Aspire 3750

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemAcer Aspire 3750  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer JE30_HR
Memory6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20111031
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 25 '22 at 20:12
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2760QM-$130
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 93.1
1-Core 91.3
2-Core 177
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 358
41% 319 Pts
64-Core 359
22% 359 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Acer(1025 0539) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.2849
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.98% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 1.6
2% 2.23 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.87 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.98%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
GOODRAM 120GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 57 58 55 55 53 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.1% Poor
Read 264
Write 13.6
Mixed 27
SusWrite 54.7
19% 89.7 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 4.3
44% 10.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 97%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$55
695GB free
Firmware: 01.0
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 92.2
Mixed 36.1
48% 64.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
86% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT451S6BFR8A-PB HMT451S6DFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
53.9% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 16.4
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 3750 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 3750

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback