Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-HD2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-HD2  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151224
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateJan 18 '22 at 10:33
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-6400K APU-$81
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
42.6% Average
Memory 73.2
1-Core 58.4
2-Core 82.8
47% 71.5 Pts
4-Core 71.6
8-Core 78.7
10% 75.1 Pts
64-Core 75.4
5% 75.4 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8470D
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
2.47% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 3.6
2% 3.5 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 3.2
Splatting 3.1
2% 2.83 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.47%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$25
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR041
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 158 154 145 146 143 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 326
Write 278
Mixed 267
SusWrite 146
57% 254 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 16.5
4K Mixed 9.4
46% 14.1 MB/s
DQ Read 24.6
DQ Write 60.5
DQ Mixed 19.1
21% 34.7 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 92%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
737GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 158 155 146 146 144 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 161
Mixed 91.2
SusWrite 147
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
236% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20% Very poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 6.2
18% 6.13 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 7.3
18% 6.23 GB/s
Latency 94.2
42% 94.2 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A68HM-HD2 Builds (Compare 274 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-HD2 - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $220
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback