Blade Shadow Computer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics99.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive89.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemBlade Shadow Computer  (all builds)
MotherboardBlade ShadowM
Memory7.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190103
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 19 '22 at 19:43
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
CPU1 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
61.9% Good
Memory 72.6
1-Core 73.7
2-Core 142
57% 96.2 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 460
45% 368 Pts
64-Core 495
31% 495 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Zotac(19DA 1425) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.8% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 136
Parallax 138
102% 133 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 128
Splatting 111
95% 117 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 275GB
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 119 119 105 116 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 500
Write 593
Mixed 510
SusWrite 124
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 50.4
4K Write 39.6
4K Mixed 43.3
153% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 341
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 349
258% 340 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 108%
Qemu HARDDISK 1.5TB
570GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 119 119 119 119 119 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
96.7% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 595
Mixed 518
SusWrite 135
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 56.6
4K Write 49.9
4K Mixed 50.5
177% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 327
242% 318 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Blade WFDGNU0GIZTDYK-UEC 1x12GB
1 of 1 slots used
12GB DIMM RAM clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.7% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 19
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 14.9
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 95.5
42% 95.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Shadow Computer Builds (Compare 610 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Blade Shadow Computer

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback