Asus P8B75-M LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M LE  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121016
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 19 '22 at 20:02
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 70%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Memory 76.7
1-Core 71.4
2-Core 130
56% 92.8 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 237
32% 236 Pts
64-Core 213
13% 213 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 8641) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.23
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.2% Poor
Lighting 35.6
Reflection 49
Parallax 30.1
29% 38.2 fps
MRender 36.8
Gravity 37.6
Splatting 34.8
30% 36.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix SH920 2.5 256GB
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1010CL00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 142 156 160 153 160 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.8% Below average
Read 146
Write 145
Mixed 143
SusWrite 150
33% 146 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 35.3
4K Mixed 16.6
60% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 22.5
DQ Write 74.5
DQ Mixed 28.9
28% 42 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 91%
WD Black 500GB (2012)-$49
392GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 165 168 172 170 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 156
Mixed 88.7
SusWrite 166
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965525-155.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
36.3% Below average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 11.9
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 10.9
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-M LE Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $335
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback