HP Pavilion 15 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion 15 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 216F
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '22 at 06:26
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-5000 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Memory 51.6
1-Core 23.1
2-Core 41.1
27% 38.6 Pts
4-Core 90.3
8-Core 82.6
12% 86.4 Pts
64-Core 86.8
5% 86.8 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8330
HP(103C 216F) 512MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 12.102.4.6000
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.55% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 1.8
1% 2.2 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 3
2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.55%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9250410AS 250GB-$42
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 44 42 44 47 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Read 35
Write 58.5
Mixed 35.9
SusWrite 44
32% 43.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.8% Very poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 6
17% 5.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 6.7
16% 5.47 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion 15 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 4,274 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion 15 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $309
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback