Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 14%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 213B
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141111
Uptime22.1 Days
Run DateNov 06 '22 at 01:12
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-5000 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Memory 20.2
1-Core 22.2
2-Core 36
16% 26.1 Pts
4-Core 55.7
8-Core 74
8% 64.8 Pts
64-Core 74
5% 74 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8330
HP(103C 213B) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.52% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 3
Parallax 2
1% 2.2 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 1.5
Splatting 3
2% 2.27 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.52%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 750GB-$125
351GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JA2OA590
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 47 49 45 41 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Read 44
Write 75
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 48.5
35% 47.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.2
70% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP16D3LS1KBG/4G 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 3.9
11% 3.93 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 0.7
5% 1.9 GB/s
Latency 319
12% 319 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion 17 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 1,246 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback