bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory31.2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 31.2GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory12.8 GB free of 31.25 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191217
Uptime25 Days
Run DateJan 21 '22 at 15:51
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 4110
None, 2 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
62.9% Good
Memory 66.8
1-Core 81.3
2-Core 143
57% 97.2 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 518
51% 418 Pts
64-Core 663
41% 663 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 63%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 215GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 567
Write 275
Mixed 408
92% 417 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 20
4K Mixed 21.9
80% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 218
DQ Mixed 273
207% 283 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 88%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 537GB
369GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 609
Write 376
Mixed 449
106% 478 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 22.1
4K Mixed 21.9
78% 23.1 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 299
221% 295 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 85%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 537GB
473GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 563
Write 335
Mixed 448
99% 449 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 21.5
4K Mixed 22.2
76% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 329
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 273
206% 277 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None Corporation None 31GB
0, 0, 0 MHz
3968, 12032, 16000 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.5% Below average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 14.4
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6.3
19% 6.6 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,556 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback