Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics85% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJan 22 '22 at 16:34
Run Duration348 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 5700 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$78
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Memory 88.9
1-Core 141
2-Core 251
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 859
83% 683 Pts
64-Core 1,074
66% 1,074 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-$275
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.11.3
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 123
Parallax 162
88% 131 fps
MRender 100
Gravity 112
Splatting 81.6
79% 97.9 fps
Poor: 78%
This bench: 85%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,478
Write 2,362
Mixed 1,689
484% 2,176 MB/s
4K Read 62.2
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 88.4
294% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,305
DQ Write 960
DQ Mixed 1,109
835% 1,125 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
Foresee S40RF128GB 128GB
42GB free
Firmware: V3.33
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 454 443 189 139 139 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 478
Write 432
Mixed 359
SusWrite 302
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 83.2
4K Mixed 24.2
130% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 229
DQ Mixed 37.7
71% 139 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G36C16U4W.M8FE1 BL8G36C16U4R.M8FE1 BL8G36C16U4W.M8FE1 BL8G36C16U4R.M8FE1 32GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
79.1% Very good
MC Read 32
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 31.6
80% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 24
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 31.5
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,945 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $301
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback