Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 147%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 162%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics142% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory25 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201203
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 22 '21 at 21:41
Run Duration340 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$240
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 88
1-Core 163
2-Core 322
103% 191 Pts
4-Core 643
8-Core 1,154
108% 898 Pts
64-Core 2,224
138% 2,224 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 104%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
142% Outstanding
Lighting 203
Reflection 247
Parallax 187
165% 212 fps
MRender 191
Gravity 149
Splatting 132
126% 157 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 142%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 1TB
731GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3286 1619 1610 1586 1438 1602 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 70%
Samsung 860 1TB
442GB free
Firmware: RVQ0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 446 455 454 460 467 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 198
Mixed 231
SusWrite 454
77% 346 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 96.8
4K Mixed 34.4
137% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 174
152% 218 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 100%
Great: 116%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
931GB free
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 436 446 443 448 457 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 461
Mixed 419
SusWrite 443
103% 457 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 92.4
4K Mixed 29
123% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 169
149% 216 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
458GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 198 201 204 209 207 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 90.7
Write 104
Mixed 19.4
SusWrite 202
75% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
56% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G36C16U4W.M8FE1 BL8G36C16U4R.M8FE1 BL8G36C16U4W.M8FE1 BL8G36C16U4R.M8FE1 32GB
3600, 3600, 3600, 3600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
124% Outstanding
MC Read 53.4
MC Write 43.5
MC Mixed 42.5
133% 46.5 GB/s
SC Read 28.2
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 40.3
90% 31.7 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 124%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 13: 1R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
13% 24% 21 342 280 240 27" 2560 1440 SAM105C LC27G7xT
History: Score 38: 5R 3G 4B | Score 29: 4R 1G 6B | Score 13: 1R 2G 2B
Typical ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING Builds (Compare 13,769 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $928
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback