Today's hottest deals

Pinnaclemicro W54XTU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 57% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemPinnaclemicro W54XTU  (all builds)
MotherboardPINNACLEMICRO W54XTU
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131230
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJan 25 '22 at 06:13
Run Duration282 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU10%
CPU Throttled 57%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N2815
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 1.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
21% Poor
Memory 39.2
1-Core 9.6
2-Core 18.7
17% 22.5 Pts
4-Core 18.8
8-Core 18.6
2% 18.7 Pts
64-Core 18.2
1% 18.2 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 21%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Clevo(1558 5470) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.67% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 0.4
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.53 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.07 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.67%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000LUCT-63C26Y0 500GB
432GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 81 55 43 49 49 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 96.4
Write 92.2
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 54.8
49% 67.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
122% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMT3190ME76F8F1600 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
MC Read 3.5
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 5.2
12% 4.23 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 3.1
9% 3.17 GB/s
Latency 206
19% 206 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W54XTU Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Pinnaclemicro W54XTU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback