Average Bench: 34.9% (128th of 131)

Based on 41 user benchmarks.  Model: Ramaxel RMT3190ME76F8F1600 2x2GB

Poor average bench

The Ramaxel RMT3190ME76F8F1600 2x2GB averaged 65.1% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 12.9GB/s
Avg. Physical RAM Latency 115ns

Average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Ramaxel RMT3190ME76F8F1600 2x2GB is 40.7%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Ramaxel RMT3190ME76F8F1600 2x2GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 7.92GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 8.49GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 41 samples)
Min Avg Max
3.5 MC Read 12 20.7
2.9 MC Write 12.9 20.9
4.2 MC Mixed 12.1 17.3
35.3% 12.3 GB/s
Min Avg Max
1.9 SC Read 7.92 15.5
2.2 SC Write 8.49 18.9
2.7 SC Mixed 8.78 17.5
24% 8.4 GB/s
Min Avg Max
65.1 Latency 115 288
34.9% 115 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 15
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 13.5
36% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 15.4
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 3.5
24% 8.23 GB/s
Latency 87.6
46% 87.6 ns
2 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 13.4
38% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 6.1
14% 5.07 GB/s
Latency 93.7
43% 93.7 ns
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 10
28% 9.67 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 4.2
12% 4.03 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 10
26% 9.23 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 3.4
8% 2.97 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
MC Read 4.9
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 6.9
16% 5.6 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 4.1
11% 3.9 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
MC Read 1.6
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 4.3
10% 3.4 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 2.4
8% 2.8 GB/s
Latency 203
20% 203 ns
41 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,381,628 RAM Kits tested

Typical RMT3190ME76F8F1600 2x2GB Builds (Compare 153 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20382

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28

Popular RMT3190ME76F8F1600 2x2GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

131 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback