Asus P8B75-M LX PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive34.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M LX PLUS  (all builds)
Memory6.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140806
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 13 '17 at 09:55
Run Duration1159 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$60
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 94.9
1-Core 91.9
2-Core 169
72% 119 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 231
31% 232 Pts
64-Core 232
14% 232 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Asus(1043 844D) 1GB
CLim: 928 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 385.41
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Lighting 17.8
Reflection 16.1
Parallax 21.5
14% 18.5 fps
MRender 21.9
Gravity 21.7
Splatting 15.2
16% 19.6 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team L5 LITE SSD 1200 120GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P122 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 522
Write 15.1
Mixed 356
65% 298 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 20.5
4K Mixed 0.04
39% 13.1 MB/s
DQ Read 74.9
DQ Write 13.9
DQ Mixed 0.14
12% 29.6 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 65%
USB2.0 CARD-READER 8GB
4GB free, PID 4678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
2.2% Terrible
Read 0.95
Write 0.88
Mixed 0.92
1% 0.92 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 0.56
4K Mixed 0.44
36% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 0%
This bench: 2.2%
Great: 2%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ24GX3M6A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
62.6% Good
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 20.5
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 19.2
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 57.2
70% 57.2 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-M LX PLUS Builds (Compare 546 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M LX PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $146
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback