Asus P5Q-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.34% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive53.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P5Q-E  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '22 at 08:07
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5420-$79
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Memory 71.9
1-Core 50.9
2-Core 101
47% 74.7 Pts
4-Core 197
8-Core 199
26% 198 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203
Sapphire(174B E241) 2GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.9.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
8.34% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 37.7
Parallax 45.8
0% 27.9 fps
MRender 31.4
Gravity 33.4
Splatting 26
24% 30.3 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 8.34%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst Elite 240GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0319A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 7.6 230 61 4.9 147 MB/s
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.5% Above average
Read 244
Write 232
Mixed 240
SusWrite 76
44% 198 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 68.5
4K Mixed 20
109% 39.8 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 28.9
58% 116 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
24.7% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 7.8
23% 8 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 8.2
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 96.9
41% 96.9 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5Q-E Builds (Compare 194 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $189
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback