Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD G-T52R 6 User benchmarks, average bench 25% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	17.2% Very poor	Memory 32.5 1-Core 13.5 2-Core 13.8 16% 19.9 Pts	4-Core 13.4 8-Core 13.4 2% 13.4 Pts	64-Core 12.9 1% 12.9 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 35%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310 13,166 User benchmarks, average bench 1% AMD(1002 9803) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	0.49% Terrible	Lighting 0.2 Reflection 1.9 Parallax 1.3 0% 1.13 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 1.7 1% 1.33 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.49% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba MK4034GSX 40GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: AH401D SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 21 20 18 17 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	11.5% Very poor	Read 20.5 Write 22.1 Mixed 17.6 SusWrite 19.3 15% 19.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.4 76% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 18%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 319GB 950 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 249GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 68 69 66 58 51 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	Read 73.1 Write 54.6 Mixed 36 SusWrite 62.5 41% 56.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 132% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 484D543332355536 2x2GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	7.38% Terrible	MC Read 2.1 MC Write 1.8 MC Mixed 3 7% 2.3 GB/s	SC Read 1.5 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 2.1 6% 2 GB/s	Latency 241 17% 241 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.38% Great: 14%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
G-T56NAMDBench 28%, 116 samples	5x
G-T52RAMDBench 25%, 6 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 6320AMDBench 1%, 8,182 samples	5x
Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples	1x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $25Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	1x
RBU-SC400S3760GA 60GBKingstonBench 68%, 5 samples	1x
MZ7LN512HCHP-000L1 512GBSamsungBench 93%, 2,316 samples	1x

Value: 20% - Very poor

Total price: $25