Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD G-T56N 116 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	29.7% Poor	Memory 54.4 1-Core 20.3 2-Core 39.6 27% 38.1 Pts	4-Core 30.7 8-Core 35.5 4% 33.1 Pts	64-Core 39.7 2% 39.7 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320 8,182 User benchmarks, average bench 1% AMD(1002 9806) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	1.05% Terrible	Lighting 1.23 Reflection 1.46 Parallax 1.53 1% 1.41 fps	MRender 1.57 Gravity 0.83 Splatting 1.65 1% 1.35 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.05% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$132 14,258 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 144GB free (System drive) Firmware: LE1i SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 158 164 161 161 164 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.2% Below average	Read 204 Write 186 Mixed 174 SusWrite 159 41% 181 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 17.8 4K Mixed 13 43% 14 MB/s	DQ Read 97.5 DQ Write 81.8 DQ Mixed 90.3 68% 89.9 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 484D543332355536 2x2GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	14% Very poor	MC Read 4.7 MC Write 4 MC Mixed 5.1 13% 4.6 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 4.3 9% 3.2 GB/s	Latency 145 28% 145 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 14%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
G-T56NAMDBench 28%, 116 samples	5x
G-T52RAMDBench 25%, 6 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 6320AMDBench 1%, 8,182 samples	5x
Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples	1x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $25Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	1x
RBU-SC400S3760GA 60GBKingstonBench 68%, 5 samples	1x
MZ7LN512HCHP-000L1 512GBSamsungBench 93%, 2,316 samples	1x

Value: 20% - Very poor

Total price: $25