bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive43.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel DQ67SW
Memory8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110520
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 26 '22 at 23:20
Run Duration267 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E31220-$305
SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
70% Very good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 84.2
2-Core 167
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 322
43% 324 Pts
64-Core 317
20% 317 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5750
PwrHis(1787 2287) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
8.42% Terrible
Lighting 11.2
Reflection 11.8
Parallax 9.9
9% 11 fps
MRender 9.6
Gravity 8.6
Splatting 7.9
7% 8.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.42%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32070RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 50 83 84 82 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 374
Write 75.7
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 77.6
28% 133 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 44.5
4K Mixed 15.2
56% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 0.2
43% 104 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
462GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 139 142 142 142 142 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 142
Write 136
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 141
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 88%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
245GB free
Firmware: GM4OA5CA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 10 10 9.9 9.9 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
24.3% Poor
Read 74.2
Write 75.5
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 10
37% 49.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 51%
Hitachi TOURO Mobile 1TB
294GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 31.2
Write 24.8
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 18.2
18% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 57%
TOSHIBA MQ04ABD200 2TB
2TB free, PID 0237
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 16 16 15 17 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 34.5
Write 33.5
Mixed 10.5
SusWrite 17
30% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
34% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 52%
Generic External 1TB
99GB free, PID 1840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 30.2
Write 16.5
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 19.1
30% 22.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13%
Great: 25%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
205GB free, PID a009
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 31.5
Write 25.3
Mixed 20
SusWrite 19.1
31% 24 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
6% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 44%
VendorCo ProductCode 1TB
932GB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 19 17 19 13 20 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
9.73% Terrible
Read 33.7
Write 6.3
Mixed 2
SusWrite 16.8
16% 14.7 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 9.73%
Great: 10%
WD Elements 2TB
666GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 28.5
Write 23
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 15.9
29% 22.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 Kingston 99U5471-002.A01LF M378B5173QH0-CK0 Kingston 99U5471-002.A01LF 12GB
1600, 1333, 1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.9% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 15.5
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 14.6
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,521 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback