Performance Results


Gaming 162% UFO	Desktop 107% UFO	Workstation 195% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	154% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	315% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210809
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Jan 27 '22 at 10:53
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$416 33,026 User benchmarks, average bench 100% AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Memory 81.2 1-Core 174 2-Core 347 106% 201 Pts	4-Core 684 8-Core 1,332 119% 1,008 Pts	64-Core 2,781 172% 2,781 Pts
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 110%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% Nvidia(10DE 153A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.29 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	154% Outstanding	Lighting 228 Reflection 216 Parallax 224 186% 223 fps	MRender 197 Gravity 160 Splatting 141 133% 166 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 154% Great: 158%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 381GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1788 892 790 794 797 796 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	315% Outstanding	Read 2,562 Write 1,796 Mixed 1,635 SusWrite 976 388% 1,742 MB/s	4K Read 68.5 4K Write 152 4K Mixed 91 301% 104 MB/s	DQ Read 1,441 DQ Write 1,234 DQ Mixed 1,336 1,002% 1,337 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 315% Great: 355%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 126 129 127 129 126 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	86% Excellent	Read 172 Write 171 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 127 90% 125 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 157% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 108%
WD Purple 3TB (2014)-$85 6,631 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 65 66 52 59 54 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	33.1% Below average	Read 58.6 Write 2.2 Mixed 13.2 SusWrite 56.9 24% 32.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.1 24% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hewlett-Packard 8MG03AA# 2x16GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	114% Outstanding	MC Read 61.5 MC Write 33 MC Mixed 35.1 123% 43.2 GB/s	SC Read 27.2 SC Write 19.5 SC Mixed 33.1 76% 26.6 GB/s	Latency 78.3 51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 114%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	572x
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	517x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	406x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	343x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	274x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	265x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	142x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	141x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $1,013

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16