Asrock Z270 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics96.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive205% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z270 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180321
Uptime4 Days
Run DateJan 28 '22 at 20:22
Run Duration412 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 83.4
1-Core 136
2-Core 255
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 675
72% 571 Pts
64-Core 647
40% 647 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 90%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$199
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.1.2
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.3% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 141
Parallax 184
99% 149 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 130
Splatting 94.9
91% 113 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 104%
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
ASRock(1849 1912) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.43% Terrible
Lighting 8.2
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 9.4
7% 9.03 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 8.4
Splatting 13.1
9% 10.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.43%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT401.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1122 413 656 742 739 567 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 1,636
Write 1,981
Mixed 1672
SusWrite 706
338% 1499 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 64.7
202% 70.3 MB/s
DQ Read 840
DQ Write 625
DQ Mixed 748
555% 738 MB/s
Poor: 189%
This bench: 205%
Great: 486%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
185GB free
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1447 1438 1407 1390 1428 1434 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
249% Outstanding
Read 1,862
Write 1,417
Mixed 819
SusWrite 1424
309% 1,381 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 53.1
189% 66.9 MB/s
DQ Read 913
DQ Write 408
DQ Mixed 456
392% 593 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 249%
Great: 283%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
210GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 66 68 68 68 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 102
Write 97.5
Mixed 97.1
SusWrite 67.3
68% 91 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 85%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
114GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 125 126 128 136 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 129
Write 78.6
Mixed 81.6
SusWrite 129
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3400 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.7% Good
MC Read 23.4
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 20.6
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 24.6
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 1,180 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock Z270 Extreme4 - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $933
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback