Today's hottest deals

Intel X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics33.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel X79  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 29 '22 at 00:56
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Memory 65.5
1-Core 46.4
2-Core 107
44% 72.9 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 522
46% 393 Pts
64-Core 964
60% 964 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7970-$435
AMD(1002 3000) 3GB
CLim: 950 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.3% Below average
Lighting 44.9
Reflection 33.9
Parallax 57.3
37% 45.4 fps
MRender 30.2
Gravity 47.9
Splatting 24
27% 34 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xraydisk 256GB 256GB
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1111H0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 630 347 263 234 294 197 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 1,304
Write 1,005
Mixed 803
SusWrite 328
191% 860 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 73.8
4K Mixed 22.2
112% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 395
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 356
265% 352 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 121%
Great: 156%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$150
184GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 225 225 227 228 228 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 452
Write 438
Mixed 316
SusWrite 247
82% 363 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 63.7
4K Mixed 35.9
122% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 353
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 307
234% 316 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 114%
Hitachi HDT725025VLA380 250GB-$132
16GB free
Firmware: V5DOA52A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 34 35 35 37 39 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Read 60.1
Write 58.7
Mixed 37
SusWrite 35.9
35% 47.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KRE-D3U1600M/ KHX1866C10D3/ 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.6% Average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 17.2
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 6.5
22% 7.87 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 2,058 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback