Today's hottest deals

Intel X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel X79  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '22 at 19:04
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 66.8
2-Core 133
57% 93.5 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 609
54% 459 Pts
64-Core 982
61% 982 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Asus(1043 84F0) 2GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Lighting 18.6
Reflection 17.5
Parallax 16.9
15% 17.7 fps
MRender 22.7
Gravity 19
Splatting 15.6
15% 19.1 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$150
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 109 63 59 56 57 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.7% Above average
Read 251
Write 239
Mixed 195
SusWrite 96.4
44% 196 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 33.3
4K Mixed 26.8
86% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 198
149% 198 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 114%
Hitachi HDT725025VLA380 250GB-$132
19GB free
Firmware: V5DOA52A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 63 62 62 61 58 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 59.5
Write 56.7
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 61.3
39% 53.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 35%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB
35GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 20 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 32
Write 18.9
Mixed 21
SusWrite 19.1
29% 22.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.3
108% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KRE-D3U1600M/ KHX1866C10D3/ 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.6% Below average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 9.8
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 2,058 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback