Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics47.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12.7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12.7GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory7.9 GB free of 12.6953 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 30 '22 at 15:41
Run Duration88 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
60.1% Good
Memory 61.7
1-Core 87.4
2-Core 173
60% 107 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 518
51% 416 Pts
64-Core 552
34% 552 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
Device(0000 0000)
Driver: Ver. 10.0.19041.1
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.7% Average
Lighting 58.9
Reflection 59.3
Parallax 56
48% 58.1 fps
MRender 54.8
Gravity 60.6
Splatting 57.5
47% 57.6 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 59%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 64GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,181
Write 1,138
Mixed 1,058
251% 1,126 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 19.1
4K Mixed 18.1
60% 18.2 MB/s
DQ Read 344
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 324
245% 328 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None 12GB
0, 0 MHz
3072, 9928 MB
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
78% Very good
MC Read 35
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 28.7
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 19.1
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 123
33% 123 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 78%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,891 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback