Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics200% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory60 GB free of 64 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 30 '22 at 21:58
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X 64-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Memory 79.1
1-Core 140
2-Core 281
90% 167 Pts
4-Core 549
8-Core 1,114
98% 832 Pts
64-Core 4,205
260% 4,205 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX A6000
Nvidia(10DE 1459) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 48GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
200% Outstanding
Lighting 288
Reflection 293
Parallax 314
235% 298 fps
MRender 316
Gravity 268
Splatting 189
204% 258 fps
Poor: 174%
This bench: 200%
Great: 218%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 1TB
393GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 924 794 805 764 735 718 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 51% Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM RAM
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
218% Outstanding
MC Read 91
MC Write 88.9
MC Mixed 87.9
255% 89.3 GB/s
SC Read 24.4
SC Write 22.5
SC Mixed 40.5
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 218%
Great: 223%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 618 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback