Today's hottest deals

Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX CODE  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateJan 31 '22 at 01:53
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$148
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 87.7
1-Core 138
2-Core 262
90% 163 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 750
73% 601 Pts
64-Core 756
47% 756 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
106% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 119
Parallax 131
107% 127 fps
MRender 177
Gravity 128
Splatting 109
110% 138 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GB-$550
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 8EV10171 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,065
Write 910
Mixed 612
191% 862 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 51.6
223% 90.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,026
DQ Write 906
DQ Mixed 935
710% 956 MB/s
Poor: 123% Great: 230%
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70
55GB free
Firmware: 521ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 190 165 174 163 144 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 363
Write 234
Mixed 236
SusWrite 175
56% 252 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 46.4
164% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 240
184% 250 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 94%
Addlink M.2 PCIE G3x4 NVMe 512GB
429GB free
Firmware: ECFM22.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1439 528 520 517 516 522 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 1419
Write 2,262
Mixed 1,431
SusWrite 673
327% 1,447 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 193
4K Mixed 80.4
271% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 679
DQ Write 1087
DQ Mixed 1,013
731% 926 MB/s
Poor: 109%
This bench: 222%
Great: 275%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.6% Very good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 22.8
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 30.5
SC Mixed 24
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 144 35" 1280 720 VTK0350 VIOTEKGN35LD
Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,363 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,053
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback