Today's hottest deals

Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics47.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 09 '22 at 18:32
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 85
2-Core 164
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 609
55% 461 Pts
64-Core 987
61% 987 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan-$1,088
EVGA(3842 2790) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 1616 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.2% Average
Lighting 54.6
Reflection 85.5
Parallax 77
44% 72.4 fps
MRender 72.7
Gravity 62
Splatting 59.3
52% 64.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,804
Write 3,116
Mixed 3,214
752% 3,378 MB/s
4K Read 158
4K Write 81.6
4K Mixed 77.7
383% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 342
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 242
186% 256 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GB-$550
336GB free
Firmware: 8EV101H0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 880 905 848 856 859 836 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 520
Write 926
Mixed 544
SusWrite 864
162% 713 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 62.5
4K Mixed 35
122% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 310
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 263
197% 264 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 123%
Great: 230%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 48.2
MC Write 39.9
MC Mixed 42.2
124% 43.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 11.4
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 108%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV EXTREME Builds (Compare 1,645 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME - $589

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $1,154
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback