Monster ABRA A5 V16.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V16.1  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A5 V16.1
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190429
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '22 at 01:07
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 91.2
1-Core 124
2-Core 245
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 672
66% 537 Pts
64-Core 648
40% 648 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 83%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Clevo(1558 8552) 3GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7196
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Lighting 35.7
Reflection 48.2
Parallax 38.7
29% 40.9 fps
MRender 28.7
Gravity 38.8
Splatting 26.4
25% 31.3 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 480GB-$89
271GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0221A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 69 74 30 41 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 428
Write 365
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 87.3
50% 225 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 10.5
4K Mixed 0.7
29% 8.63 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 68.5
DQ Mixed 0.4
28% 69.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5700-027.A00G Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
MC Read 33.6
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 23.7
85% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 34.8
SC Mixed 26.5
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A5 V16.1 Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A5 V16.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback