Asus PRIME Z390-P

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.51% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	280% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME Z390-P (all builds)
Memory	51.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.5 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210106
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 04 '22 at 08:06
Run Duration	402 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$131 312,220 User benchmarks, average bench 82% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	79.9% Very good	Memory 75.8 1-Core 122 2-Core 245 81% 147 Pts	4-Core 452 8-Core 692 71% 572 Pts	64-Core 640 40% 640 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7) 147,588 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 8694) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1191 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	5.51% Terrible	Lighting 5.7 Reflection 7.3 Parallax 6.6 5% 6.53 fps	MRender 9.9 Gravity 5.9 Splatting 10.1 7% 8.63 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.51% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 518GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1491 1467 1341 1433 1370 1368 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	280% Outstanding	Read 2,384 Write 2,040 Mixed 1,587 SusWrite 1,412 416% 1,856 MB/s	4K Read 45.9 4K Write 100 4K Mixed 68.3 210% 71.4 MB/s	DQ Read 813 DQ Write 645 DQ Mixed 603 486% 687 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 280% Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 126GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,258 Write 1,027 Mixed 1,006 244% 1,097 MB/s	4K Read 56.8 4K Write 98.5 4K Mixed 69.4 227% 74.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,029 DQ Write 746 DQ Mixed 651 550% 809 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$107 80,665 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 838GB free Firmware: 0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 382 Write 378 Mixed 348 82% 369 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 37.8 4K Mixed 27.7 88% 29 MB/s	DQ Read 124 DQ Write 132 DQ Mixed 123 94% 126 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 128%
WD Green 2TB (2010)-$100 5,498 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 486GB free Firmware: 0107 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 56 57 59 58 58 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	32.5% Below average	Read 56 Write 61.4 Mixed 52.2 SusWrite 56.9 42% 56.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 108% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 553GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 107 111 109 106 107 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	53.9% Above average	Read 81.6 Write 101 Mixed 64.2 SusWrite 106 65% 88.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 34% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 90%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$64 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 339GB free Firmware: 0107 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 55 59 59 58 57 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	36.2% Below average	Read 68.5 Write 66.5 Mixed 56.1 SusWrite 57.5 46% 62.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 57%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 786GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 170 174 173 171 173 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 199 Write 149 Mixed 80.6 SusWrite 170 109% 150 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 114%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 600GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 138 Write 131 Mixed 76.7 86% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 83%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70 66,332 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 443GB free Firmware: CC41 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 148 Write 102 Mixed 85.1 83% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 1.6 315% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 111%
WD Green 2TB (2010)-$100 5,498 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 337GB free Firmware: 51.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 73 74 73 74 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	42.9% Average	Read 76 Write 74.1 Mixed 53.4 SusWrite 73.3 51% 69.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$63 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2TB free Firmware: CC44 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 84.8 Write 82.9 Mixed 33.3 49% 67 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.4 74% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 113%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$95 26,217 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 714GB free Firmware: SC60 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 154 Write 152 Mixed 71 93% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 108%
WD Green 2TB (2010)-$100 5,498 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 326GB free Firmware: 51.0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 34 Write 20.6 Mixed 18.1 18% 24.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.1 30% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 68%
Patriot Memory 124GB 700 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 113GB free, PID 6000 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 224 Write 70.4 Mixed 137 160% 144 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1.2 103% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4DFD824A.M16FD CT16G4DFD824A.C16FBD CT16G4DFD824A.M16FD CT16G4DFD824A.C16FBD 64GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2460, 2460, 2460, 2460 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	74.1% Very good	MC Read 27.6 MC Write 29.2 MC Mixed 23.9 77% 26.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 27.1 SC Mixed 21.2 61% 21.2 GB/s	Latency 88.8 45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	27"	1280 720	ENC3069 CS2731

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME Z390-P Builds (Compare 18,261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 113%

UFO

Desktop 98%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 105%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z390-P - $106

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	5,477x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	3,165x
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	2,789x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	2,094x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	1,153x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	1,083x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $74Bench 191%, 163,917 samples	743x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	698x
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD $74Bench 228%, 180,890 samples	539x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	669x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	438x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	411x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 114% - Outstanding

Total price: $687

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16